Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:48:22 08/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1999 at 07:20:53, Shep wrote: >On August 09, 1999 at 07:07:02, Harald Faber wrote: > > >>SS=6 is a bit too low and fails sometimes. In many positions needs much more >>time to find a good move than with SS=10. Maybe 8-10 is the optimum. > >Maybe even something slightly higher, like 11-14? I will try that when I find >the time. >The 32 in my "6666 Deep" is of course exaggerated and was just interesting to >test. However, it was a revelation to see that it makes almost no difference in >closed positions (the few POSxx from LCT 2 I tested showed only 1-2 seconds time >difference and no ply difference). > >Probably we shouldn't underestimate the importance of Max Depth as well. >20 is maybe too small. I don't know what value corresponds to setting it to >"Max" (I only found out yesterday that the slider has a "Max" setting :). > >--- >Shep Don't forget there is danger to overlook some good move the higher the selectivity is... Genius and Shredder have 12...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.