Author: walter irvin
Date: 13:25:29 08/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1999 at 15:14:36, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: > >I am very glad that you are going to play Crafty! Please post the date you >expect to play and your handle, so that those who have participated in this >thread can watch! >Although it is kind of interesting...to me, it seemed that your original post >indicated that you felt you could beat these programs very easily...that none >could stand up to you...are you now saying that that isn't the case, and that >you just expect to not get shut out in a series of games? These are *vastly* >different statements...similar to saying "I can beat Pete Sampras to win a match >very easily" versus "I can play Pete Sampras, and not lose every game." > > >Chris pete sampras your that good!!! what im saying is that that crafty or any good chess program should mop the floor with a player with an rating of under 1700 yes or no?? but i think i can score more like 2300+ against computer . if i can do this .what chance really does programs have against the pros who do nothing else ? > > >On August 09, 1999 at 13:42:09, walter irvin wrote: > >>On August 09, 1999 at 13:02:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 09, 1999 at 12:34:22, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On August 09, 1999 at 10:09:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 09, 1999 at 02:55:01, hgkjhg wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Then would you let me play against crafty on icc at 120 in 40. I bit >>>>>>superchicken on one of the accounts at 15 10, but it's much harder to play >>>>>>against computers at such small times. My handle is tarantula for this week. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I don't mind at all, although I should point out that I do spool such games >>>>>thru my "computer analysis" for verification. IE if you use a computer, I >>>>>will definitely know... >>>> >>>>If the human do the computer's move only for part of the moves I do not see a >>>>way for you to know. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>Hint: tactical accuracy. >>> >>>If he only uses a computer to avoid tactical mistakes, it will show up. If >>>he only uses a computer for some moves and ignores it for others, tactical >>>errors will show up... either way it's a red flag... >>well the reason my rating is so low is it is based on very few games the 1616 >>rating is based on 8 games in KY my only 8 tourn games i had played to that time >>. the 1200 some thing was a tourn that i was going through a divorce and i >>played badly,what hurt my rating the most was i was playing a 8 year old girl >>who had a rating of 950.she reminded me of my oldest girl sarah,who i was >>missing at the time.i took just about all her pieces but i did not have the >>heart to beat her ,so i let her draw. guess i'm only human not a computer.but >>i'm not going to lie to you when i'm on my game,i can play with anybody.right >>now i'm in training for the kings island open,which i will win ,because of the >>section im in .i'll be playing on icc in 2 weeks then i will challenge crafty >>.the only thing is i need a respectable time control,at least 15 15 my mouse >>dont move faster than that .im not saying i would win a match, what i'm saying >>is i wont be shut out,against anybody or any thing not including gm . >>as for the program i am not finished , programing is a lot harder and time >>consuming than playing chess thats for sure , also since im not a very good >>programmer compared to chess player .but it appears i have plenty of time as >>nobody is going to program chess the way i am .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.