Author: Michael Fuhrmann
Date: 13:35:46 08/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1999 at 16:25:29, walter irvin wrote: >On August 09, 1999 at 15:14:36, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: > >> >>I am very glad that you are going to play Crafty! Please post the date you >>expect to play and your handle, so that those who have participated in this >>thread can watch! >>Although it is kind of interesting...to me, it seemed that your original post >>indicated that you felt you could beat these programs very easily...that none >>could stand up to you...are you now saying that that isn't the case, and that >>you just expect to not get shut out in a series of games? These are *vastly* >>different statements...similar to saying "I can beat Pete Sampras to win a match >>very easily" versus "I can play Pete Sampras, and not lose every game." >> >> >>Chris >pete sampras your that good!!! what im saying is that that crafty or any good >chess program should mop the floor with a player with an rating of under 1700 >yes or no?? but i think i can score more like 2300+ against computer . Seems to me that if it were so easy for a 1700 player to get respectable scores against Crafty, its rating wouldn't be in the 3000 point range. if i can >do this .what chance really does programs have against the pros who do nothing >else ? >> >> >>On August 09, 1999 at 13:42:09, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>On August 09, 1999 at 13:02:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On August 09, 1999 at 12:34:22, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On August 09, 1999 at 10:09:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 09, 1999 at 02:55:01, hgkjhg wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Then would you let me play against crafty on icc at 120 in 40. I bit >>>>>>>superchicken on one of the accounts at 15 10, but it's much harder to play >>>>>>>against computers at such small times. My handle is tarantula for this week. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't mind at all, although I should point out that I do spool such games >>>>>>thru my "computer analysis" for verification. IE if you use a computer, I >>>>>>will definitely know... >>>>> >>>>>If the human do the computer's move only for part of the moves I do not see a >>>>>way for you to know. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>> >>>>Hint: tactical accuracy. >>>> >>>>If he only uses a computer to avoid tactical mistakes, it will show up. If >>>>he only uses a computer for some moves and ignores it for others, tactical >>>>errors will show up... either way it's a red flag... >>>well the reason my rating is so low is it is based on very few games the 1616 >>>rating is based on 8 games in KY my only 8 tourn games i had played to that time >>>. the 1200 some thing was a tourn that i was going through a divorce and i >>>played badly,what hurt my rating the most was i was playing a 8 year old girl >>>who had a rating of 950.she reminded me of my oldest girl sarah,who i was >>>missing at the time.i took just about all her pieces but i did not have the >>>heart to beat her ,so i let her draw. guess i'm only human not a computer.but >>>i'm not going to lie to you when i'm on my game,i can play with anybody.right >>>now i'm in training for the kings island open,which i will win ,because of the >>>section im in .i'll be playing on icc in 2 weeks then i will challenge crafty >>>.the only thing is i need a respectable time control,at least 15 15 my mouse >>>dont move faster than that .im not saying i would win a match, what i'm saying >>>is i wont be shut out,against anybody or any thing not including gm . >>>as for the program i am not finished , programing is a lot harder and time >>>consuming than playing chess thats for sure , also since im not a very good >>>programmer compared to chess player .but it appears i have plenty of time as >>>nobody is going to program chess the way i am .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.