Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:04:23 08/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1999 at 14:22:49, walter irvin wrote: >On August 09, 1999 at 09:46:17, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: > >>Are you the Walter Irvin with a USCF rating of 1616? Or the Walter Irvin with a >>USCF rating of 1250? If so, it is totally inconceivable that you are even >>*remotely near* the strength of any of the top programs. I know...I am a USCF >>Master (rated 500+ points higher than you), and I am not even near them. >> >>You were on here several months ago talking about how you had the best program >>in the world, etc. But you refused to allow me to play it. You made an >>outrageous claim then, and you are making an outrageous claim now. >> >>If you expect *anyone* here to give any credence at all to anything you say (and >>not just about this...literally any comment you make will be considered trivial >>unless you validate yourself on this one) you must prove your statement. >> >>Bob Hyatt offered to let you play Crafty on ICC. If you can beat Crafty (without >>the aid of a computer on your end), then your statement may have some merit. But >>unless you do this, you will be considered some random crank, who just logs on >>every once in a while, and who obviously knows so little about computer and >>chess that his statements should be ignored completely. >> >> >>WHy do you post such statements if you are unwilling to back them up? They fly >>in the face of *all* evidence and experience. You must realize that they appear >>very peculiar to say the least. >> >>Chris Dorr >>USCF Master >well the thing is i have played many more games vs computers than you , does >not mean i better than you , maybe better against computers . its a possibility >.plus my true rating is not 1616 ,1250 ect they are ratings based on see below >posting .i think im some where around 2100 or so .but that will change as i have >been practicing 6 or 7 hr. day every day .my new financial situation allows me >to devote much more time than ever before .plus i will be able to compete a >whole lot more .plus i have something you need to be champion i believe in >myself 100%. >> If your real rating is 1600, then you really don't stand a snowball's chance in you-know-where of beating a computer program on decent hardware, without taking back moves or seeing analysis. It just won't happen... >> >>On August 08, 1999 at 21:21:14, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>i just dont think it can be done .no one can build a chess program that i can >>>not beat, not even me .hiarcs was doing good the first 3 or 4 games , now easy >>>money .this coming from a under 2000 elo player .if i find it easy gm should >>>find it childs play ?????????
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.