Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: give up

Author: Mark Young

Date: 19:26:50 08/09/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 09, 1999 at 20:32:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 09, 1999 at 18:30:57, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On August 09, 1999 at 17:04:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On August 09, 1999 at 14:22:49, walter irvin wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 09, 1999 at 09:46:17, Christopher R. Dorr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Are you the Walter Irvin with a USCF rating of 1616? Or the Walter Irvin with a
>>>>>USCF rating of 1250? If so, it is totally inconceivable that you are even
>>>>>*remotely near* the strength of any of the top programs. I know...I am a USCF
>>>>>Master (rated 500+ points higher than you), and I am not even near them.
>>>>>
>>>>>You were on here several months ago talking about how you had the best program
>>>>>in the world, etc. But you refused to allow me to play it. You made an
>>>>>outrageous claim then, and you are making an outrageous claim now.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you expect *anyone* here to give any credence at all to anything you say (and
>>>>>not just about this...literally any comment you make will be considered trivial
>>>>>unless you validate yourself on this one) you must prove your statement.
>>>>>
>>>>>Bob Hyatt offered to let you play Crafty on ICC. If you can beat Crafty (without
>>>>>the aid of a computer on your end), then your statement may have some merit. But
>>>>>unless you do this, you will be considered some random crank, who just logs on
>>>>>every once in a while, and who obviously knows so little about computer and
>>>>>chess that his statements should be ignored completely.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>WHy do you post such statements if you are unwilling to back them up? They fly
>>>>>in the face of *all* evidence and experience. You must realize that they appear
>>>>>very peculiar to say the least.
>>>>>
>>>>>Chris Dorr
>>>>>USCF Master
>>>>well  the thing is i have played many more games vs computers than you , does
>>>>not mean i better than you , maybe better against computers . its a possibility
>>>>.plus my true rating is not 1616 ,1250 ect they are ratings based on see below
>>>>posting .i think im some where around 2100 or so .but that will change as i have
>>>>been practicing 6 or 7 hr. day every day .my new financial situation allows me
>>>>to devote much more time than ever before .plus i will be able to compete a
>>>>whole lot more .plus i have something you need to be champion i believe in
>>>>myself 100%.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>If your real rating is 1600, then you really don't stand a snowball's chance
>>>in you-know-where of beating a computer program on decent hardware, without
>>>taking back moves or seeing analysis.  It just won't happen...
>>
>>I am glad you brought up the point about seeing the computers analysis. I know
>>many players at the club who claimed they could beat or draw one of the top
>>programs. In all the cases I have seen they could only do this if they could see
>>the programs thinking lines. After I "showed them how to turn off the analysis."
>>It was crush city for the programs, but of course they claim they never looked
>>at the analysis when they were playing.:) In my state the best player is IM Mike
>>Brooks, and we has just a hand full of masters and most of them a below 2300.
>>There is no doubt in my mind that the best programs could beat or crush any play
>>in my state at any over the board time control.
>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>Actually I think there is a more common reason.  "take back".
>
>Helps an awful lot, and most people do it so often, they forget they are
>even doing it...  just "damn..  forgot about that, hmmm.. I was distracted so
>I'm going to take it back since I _really_ wouldn't have done that in a real
>game..."

You may be correct, this is the reason...but with someone else watch the
game...if you take back a move you lose in my book. This is not golf..

>
>:)
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On August 08, 1999 at 21:21:14, walter irvin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>i just dont think it can be done .no one can build a chess program that i can
>>>>>>not beat, not even me .hiarcs was doing good the first 3 or 4 games , now easy
>>>>>>money .this coming from a under 2000 elo player .if i find it easy gm should
>>>>>>find it childs play ?????????



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.