Author: blass uri
Date: 23:29:51 08/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 1999 at 17:10:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I have yet to find a single game at 40/2 with no tactical errors. Even by >Kasparov. They might not be 'losing' tactical errors, but they are errors all >the same... > >That is usually the give-away, because someone using a computer might make a >weak move here and there, but they _never_ hang pawns or overlook winning them >when it is reasonable to do so... just like a computer, and much unlike a >human, even a super-GM. 1)What do you mean by tactical error? If you mean that the biggest change in the evaluation is not more than 0.5 pawn then I drew in the past a game at tournament tiem control of more than 40 moves with no tactical errors (I analyzed it with a computer and the biggest change in the evaluation was not more than 0.5 pawn) The opponent's rating was close to 1800 and my rating was 1985. 2)It is also possible that a move that the computer evaluate as a tactical error is a good move and a human who use a computer can play it (analyzing the position with a computer can help the human to be sure that the move is not a tactical blunder). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.