Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:28:49 08/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 1999 at 02:58:41, blass uri wrote: > >On August 09, 1999 at 17:10:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > ><snipped> >>I have yet to find a single game at 40/2 with no tactical errors. Even by >>Kasparov. They might not be 'losing' tactical errors, but they are errors all >>the same... > >Did you look at the games of kasparov against Deeper blue? >Do you see tactical errors in all of the 4 games that kasparov did not lose? >Do you see a tactical error of kasparov except resigning in the second game? > >Uri I and several others looked at them.. And yes, there were tactical errors. As I said, _all_ errors don't cause a game to be lost. All errors don't cause a win to become a draw. They are simply errors that fail to win material, or which lose material _if_ the opponent sees it. He made even more in the match he won the previous year. Having a choice between +4 and +2 he took +2 at least one time in a not horribly complicated endgame, even... I don't pay much attention to moves that don't change the game outcome. But a computer will _never_ do such things. And the inverse 'blunder' is also true... moves that _appear_ to win material but really don't... moves that only a computer would make...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.