Author: Alex Boby
Date: 18:07:53 08/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 1999 at 19:56:10, Marc Plum wrote: >A while back I ran some multiple engine tournaments within the Nimzo99 >interface. One thing that I noticed was that some programs would make >meaningless underpromotions. That is, in a position where a promoted pawn would >be immediately exchanged anyway, the computer might promote to a bishop or rook >rather than a queen. I had occasionally encountered the same thing in my own >games with computers; I also found a small number of computer games like this >when doing a database search for underpromotions. I don't have any statistics >to present; I'm just noting that this happens not infrequently. > >When a human player does this, he is probably just being whimsical, or it could >be a psychological ploy. I wonder, though, why a computer would do it. Is it >just a random thing? Does the computer reason that losing a bishop is less bad >than losing a queen, even though the resulting position is the same? Or do >computers like messing with people's minds too? > >Marc Plum I think it probably just random. Since either of the 4 moves will result in exactly the same position and thus exactly the same eval,.. it's probably just a matter of what order they're generated in or sorted in.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.