Author: Tina Long
Date: 18:52:48 08/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 1999 at 03:58:38, Ed Schröder wrote: <some snipping> > >The N-best feature is a very nice one because it produces "real scores". This >is certainly a big plus above Rebel's "Analyze Include" and "Analyze Exclude" >options. However the disadvantage is that the "N-best feature" is slow as a >snail due to alpha/beta. Rebel's "Analyze Include" and "Analyze Exclude" >do not have this problem in fact they speed-up the search tremendously. > >One day the "N-best feature" will be in Rebel too that's for sure. I am still >searching for a way to make it faster as I was not satisfied with its speed >when I made some experiments. > >Ed Schroder Analysis exclude, to find next bests, is a fine method by me, however I have to manually do the excluding. Could this be automated? eg. Analysis of position until (state ply depth or time), log this result, restart analysis with previous find excluded (with an originally requested 2nd ply depth or time). This would simulate the way I use Analysis exclude. This would save me getting up at 3:00 am, writing down analysis results, excluding the move & then returning to bed. Can't wait for the next Rebel. Will I get Rebel for Windows 6 months earlier as Summer here in Southern Hemisphere is in January? Hi guys, Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.