Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:27:11 08/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 1999 at 21:52:48, Tina Long wrote: >On August 10, 1999 at 03:58:38, Ed Schröder wrote: ><some snipping> >> >>The N-best feature is a very nice one because it produces "real scores". This >>is certainly a big plus above Rebel's "Analyze Include" and "Analyze Exclude" >>options. However the disadvantage is that the "N-best feature" is slow as a >>snail due to alpha/beta. Rebel's "Analyze Include" and "Analyze Exclude" >>do not have this problem in fact they speed-up the search tremendously. >> >>One day the "N-best feature" will be in Rebel too that's for sure. I am still >>searching for a way to make it faster as I was not satisfied with its speed >>when I made some experiments. >> >>Ed Schroder > >Analysis exclude, to find next bests, is a fine method by me, however I have to >manually do the excluding. > >Could this be automated? eg. >Analysis of position until (state ply depth or time), log this result, restart >analysis with previous find excluded (with an originally requested 2nd ply depth >or time). > >This would simulate the way I use Analysis exclude. >This would save me getting up at 3:00 am, writing down analysis results, >excluding the move & then returning to bed. this is how the 'annotate' command works in crafty... so that you can say "show me the best N moves" at each point in the game, or however you want to use it. > >Can't wait for the next Rebel. > >Will I get Rebel for Windows 6 months earlier as Summer here in Southern >Hemisphere is in January? > >Hi guys, >Tina Long
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.