Author: blass uri
Date: 05:35:52 08/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1999 at 05:59:25, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >Hi there > >Here is a game I won against Hiarcs 7.32 (pgn below). >Mighty proud to have fair and square defeated the "superstrong" >Hiarcs, I looked at the game in analysis mode, but on a different >computer and now I am perplexed... > >The game was played on computer A (see below). When analyzing on >computer B I noticed that the analysis is much faster on B, much >more than I would expect from the hardware. What is even more >strange is that the evaluation of the position on the two computers >are sometimes very different. Computer A is much more pessimistic. >For instance, after 14. Kh1 Hiarcs played 14 ... Bd7 in the game >with an eval of 0.61 (positive good for white = me) after search >to depth 10. On comp B the eval is around equality and Bd7 is move >nr 4 in the analysis candidate list after depth 10, eval = 0.00. My hiarcs on p200 got Bd7 0.61 9/27,0.68/10/30 I stopped it after more than 10 minutes and did not give it to finish iteration 10. I suspect that the results of hiarcs on computer B are based on learning from the game that it lost. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.