Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 15:49:30 08/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1999 at 18:02:46, Ratko V Tomic wrote: >> But given its lack of success, I don't think it is >> sensible to extoll its virtues and simultaneously >> denigrate ideas that actually have been shown to >> work effectively. > >I was only responding to much more derrogatory >comments about his work. It is not so unusual >that a high value contribution doesn't get >understood and appreciated by the experts of >the day. Okay. But speaking scientifically, what is high value about something that is completely forged? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.