Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Meaningless Underpromotions

Author: Ratko V Tomic

Date: 17:26:32 08/11/99

Go up one level in this thread


 > But speaking scientifically, what is high
 > value about something that is completely forged?

For example, it is not so unusual that a graduate student
forges data. That doesn't invalidate scientific work of
his advisor, or the theory which the data confirmed.

There are performance i results pressures, real experiments
require eliminating lots of spurious effects which mask the
one person is looking for, and some people just can't resist
the shortcuts. Who actually faked Pioneer project results
(if that actually happened), I don't know, it could have
been any programmer on the project.

Or it could have been even Botvinnik. After all, Mendel
had faked results for his genetic inheritance experiments
to get better agreement with his theory (which turned out
to be a correct theory, it's just that in practice it was
harder to confirm than he had patience for). To get funding
scientists often exaggerate importance and sometimes even
fake the results, or hand-pick data which fit better, not
because they doubt their theory but because they cannot
produce sufficently flashy results in a given time and
given resources to attract the funding.

In case of Botvinnik's chess programming ideas, I think
the main value is that he had condensed, through the years
of in depth introspection, the algorithms of his own chess
thinking. Given his caliber as a player, his general
intellect and the years he put in his efforts of
analysing and reporting his own mental algorithms, his
"core dump," as it were, is worth much more than what
someone tells psychologist in an interview, or what
a much weaker player can glimpse at in his own mind.

I think that once somene manages to capture fully
those mental algorithms in a program (which his
programmers with their modest resources and/or capabilities
have failed to do), this program will be so much ahead
of the rest of chess programs and human players, it
will be comical to watch them try playing against it.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.