Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 13:28:27 08/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 1999 at 15:29:49, Pete Galati wrote: >On August 15, 1999 at 15:05:58, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>On August 15, 1999 at 10:16:03, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On August 15, 1999 at 08:14:37, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On August 15, 1999 at 04:55:23, Tania Devora wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Nice game Ed !!!! Rebel 10 are playing a very strong chess. Very solid. >>>>> >>>>>I think that Mr Rhode has very much experience and he know very well how to >>>>>play against programs, he is a very good Grand Master too. >>>>> >>>>>Congratulations Ed !!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Rebel 10 Century ! I can't wait to see this program!!!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Greetings! >>>>> >>>>>Tania. >>>> >>>>Thanks. I hope GM Rohde will find some time to comment yesterdays game. But >>>>at the moment he is very busy with the Las Vegas event. Actually GM Rohde >>>>had no time at all to play Rebel but he still decided to help me out for >>>>August as I could not find a GM for that month. I like to take the >>>>opportunity now to thank him in public for that! >>> >>>I think that he did it for the 250$. >>>He wanted a fast draw because of this reason. >>> >>>I think that you should continue the game and not agree to draw after 38 moves. >>>I think that if GM's want a draw they have to play. >>> >>>The position is not a simple draw. >>>I tried some fast engine-engine games in my computer and there are chances for >>>both sides to win. >>> >>>I find it surprising that other GM's did not want the 250$ in August. >>> >>>I know that GM's are not rich people and they should be happy with 250$ or even >>>200$ for one day. >>> >>>Uri >>Uri, chess could have more followers if whole games finished in checkmate or in >>a very simple draw, but that is not our reality. >>In the final position of the game Rodhe x Rebel, I don't see chances for none >>of the sides. >> >>Paulo Soares > >Then maybe it's a good thing they don't all end in a checkmate, while I feel >that more parents should be teaching Chess to their children, I would certainly >question the need for more Chess followers. > >Pete Pete, I didn't understand your point. All the sports that I know finish with a very defined result. If chess finished with a better defined result, certainly more people would be interested in the game. That means that there would be more money for chess and, consequently, for chesscomputer, resulting in better programs. Logically the people would also benefit of the good things that the chess offers. Paulo Soares
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.