Author: Paul Petersson
Date: 17:22:07 08/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 1999 at 03:10:26, Shep wrote: >On August 17, 1999 at 17:16:39, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: > >>On August 17, 1999 at 07:36:53, Baldomero Garcia, Jr. wrote: >> >>>Shep, keep up the good work. I enjoy watching these louget results. >>>I think there is a good correlation between louget test results and SSDF >>>computer ratings. >>>Baldo. >> >>I think there is a good inverse correlation between the Louget test results and >>SSDF ratings, but I do not have them here to verify this. >>Chuy. > >I think there is next to no correlation at all. > >For example, Junior has a good SSDF result and plays excellent chess, yet scores >below average on LCT 2 (the same for Fritz), whereas Hiarcs scores excellently >in both fields. >(The former also goes for Chessmaster 5555 and the latter for Chess Tiger - if >they were rated by SSDF, that is.) > An older DOS-version of Chess Tiger will be on the next SSDF-list (middle of next month). Paul >I used to consider LCT 2 the Holy Grail of strength assessment when I got >started in computer chess, but now it is only interesting to see _how many_ >positions are solved and how the really tough ones are handled. >The actual score does not matter much anymore (but yes, I keep posting it anyway >:-). > >--- >Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.