Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 07:39:02 08/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 1999 at 08:10:55, odell hall wrote: >On August 21, 1999 at 08:04:43, odell hall wrote: > >>On August 21, 1999 at 06:43:55, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On August 21, 1999 at 05:08:58, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>>Hi >>>> >>>> >>>> So far only Fritz5.32 can solve this position, I am not letting my programs >>>>think more than five minutes. Fritz 5.32 AMD-k2II 350 45mb for fritz solves in >>>>47sec!!! >>>> >>>>2n1r1k1/2p1q2p/3pN1p1/3Pp1N1/3bP3/5Q2/2r3PP/R4R1K w - - id Bart - Towerking; bm >>>>g5h7; >>> >>>I think that there are many solutions to the problem and g5h7 is not the only >>>winning move so it is not a good problem. >> >> >> >>Ok uri come on icc and i will beat any program you have with Nxh7 just to prove >>that it is the winning move. The next best move is Ra3 which is slightly >>inferior. But nxh7!! is definetely the best move! without question. >>> >>>Can Fritz5.32 defend this position with black against the program that do not >>>find g5h7? >>> >>>Uri > > >I am defining the Best move as the move which leads to the greatest loss of >material for the opposing side. Just because fritz can not defend the position >against a program that does not play nxh7 does mean that Nxh7 is not the best >move. Maybe you can explain your logic to me. No one said that there was not >many good moves in the position, only that Nxh7 is that best. I don't like your definition, but wath the better definition? Maybe the move that leads to mate in less moves? But I don't know what move leads to mate in less moves. Difficult to define "the best move" for this position and for many others. Paulo Soares
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.