Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Top Computers vs Top U.S.A. Humans

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 19:26:26 08/21/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 1999 at 18:53:10, Leon Stancliff wrote:

>                             HUMANS VS COMPUTERS
>
>
>
>Computer	      ELH Rating	 SSDF Rating	  Average	    Human	       Fide Rating
>
>at 233 Mhz
>
>
>
>Hiarcs 7.1	    2627		       2570		        2599		     Gulko		      2620
>
>Fritz 5.32	    2606		       2577		        2592		     DeFirmian	   2605
>
>CM 6000	       2606		       2576		        2592		     Seirawan	    2600
>
>Nimzo 99	      2596		       2563		        2580		     Christiansen	2590
>
>Chess Tiger	   2587		       2540		        2563		     Kaidanov	    2585
>
>Junior 5	      2579		       2543		        2561		     Benjamin	    2575
>
>Rebel 10	      2569		       2525		        2547		     Gurevich	    2575
>
>Shredder 3	    2551		       2503		        2527		     Wolfe		      2565
>
>Genius 5	      2541		       2497		        2522		     Yermolinsky	 2560
>
>MChess 7	      2547		       2506		        2516		     Shabalov	    2540
>
>
>
>Average Computer= 2560						Average Human= 2582
>
>Add 65 points for computers running at 550 Mhz. Computers Ave. 2625
>
>Computers then lead by 43 points. Win expectancy at 43 points = 56%
>
>Each human plays one white and on black with each computer. Score 112 to 88
I believe you are comparing apples and oranges. You cannot make such deduction
that computers having a higher rating based on SSDF or any other computer rating
agency is the same rating as FIDE rating.
Laurence




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.