Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: what is the best program for analysis ,display and useful fetures

Author: John R. Menke, Sr.

Date: 22:41:10 08/21/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 1999 at 18:37:11, liam hearns wrote:

>as most top programs are quiet close to each other,and unbeatable by most
>players what is the best buy for comfort ,ease of use,display,analysis ,data
>bases and useful fetures. backup and upgrade options etc.I find the likes of
>chessmaster5ooo to much and gimmicky.After all i think they are best used as a
>encylopedia.

Liam,

Chessmaster 6000 is my #1 pick, if I had to choose just one. It has everything
else beat for ease of use, and ease of learning how to use it.  It's very
intuitive.  I really like the Coach operation in CM which gives instant opening
statistics based upon the large database which is included on the CD.  Typically
you can upgrade to the next version of Chessmaster at low cost, and I understand
that Chessmaster 7000 is due out soon (on about October 1).

#2 on my list would be Fritz 5.32, mainly because it is the fastest engine I've
ever tried that still plays a good game.  It typically runs 10-20 times faster
than Chessmaster 6000, and 30-40 times faster than Hiarcs 7.32, as measured by
the number of nodes per second.  If you need a fast & deep tactical analysis of
a position, it is first choice.  I like it better than Hiarc 7.32 which somebody
recommended to me awhile back, which is probably OK with a lot of built-in
positional considerations, but that makes it a slow engine searchwise (about
half as fast as Chessmaster 6000).  Both of these (Fritz & Hiarcs) run from the
same user interface (Fritz), and a lot of other chess engines are included
and/or compatible with this interface.  This interface offers some significant
additional search and display capabilities over Chessmaster, but I have found it
difficult to learn how to use and understand.  The instruction manual and
program design leave a lot to be desired, in my opinion.

If you are very technically inclined computerwise (I'm not), then Pete's
suggestion of Winboard might be your cup of tea.  You can plug in a lot of
engines, although I don't know what you gain thereby.  It depends upon what you
want to do, I guess.

--JRM



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.