Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Amazing human....?

Author: James Robertson

Date: 16:22:22 08/23/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 23, 1999 at 17:18:30, Terry Presgrove wrote:

>On August 23, 1999 at 15:28:10, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>Yesterday on FICS I noticed scrappy (Crafty on P200x4) was playing a human who
>>had already defeated it twice at 5 5 blitz and was mopping up a third victory. I
>>was kind of suspicious, so I started talking to him and asked him to play my
>>program. Overall, it was a completely one-sided affair, but I was convinced that
>>he was not a computer when he missed several tactical things my program saw very
>>quickly.
>>
>>I asked him if he was a GM or IM, and no, he said he was unrated(!). Anyway, I
>>have never seen a human outsmart computers so well in blitz without relying on
>>standard anti-computer play. Nor did he shy away from tactics, and often after
>>complex exchanges he would come out ahead.
>>
>>Is he very unusual, or are there a lot of players like him? He also mentioned he
>>had many rated chess playing friends, and did not think he was near GM strength.
>>
>>James
>
> I had a similar situation arise ( with different results) yesterday on ICC.
> I had noticed this particular handle had gotten a couple of draws in 15 5
> games previously so I decided to take a closer look. This fellow had a 1400
> bullet, 1700 blitz and over 2400 in standard. This got me suspicious and after
> my program's second loss in a row I struck up a conversation and asked him
> about the disparity in his ratings and what his USCF or FIDE rating was. He
> said 2260. When I responded USCF or FIDE? He said he had been inactive for 6
> years and was terrible at blitz. After another exchange he said he was 19 years
> old and asked me if I was a GM and why I didn't challenge Kasparov for the
> world title. :,)
>
> TP

This guy I played did not have a wide disparity between ratings. And he did make
tactical mistakes sometimes, so he was probably not a computer.... his time use
seemed very human too. He also still made very good moves very quickly so I
think it is unlikely he was using a computer to cheat....

James



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.