Author: blass uri
Date: 20:10:54 08/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 1999 at 22:59:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 27, 1999 at 17:49:40, Terry Ripple wrote: > >>Blitz:1'/Game 1999 >> >> 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 >>1 Hiarcs 7.32 11110111½½111111½1111111111111½11111111111111111111111½1111½ >>2 Comet B04 00001000½½000000½0000000000000½00000000000000000000000½0000½ >> >>I'am using a AMD K6-2/266 and set 1.024Mb HT. (Played on a single PC) Now i - >>know why they say Hiarcs is the best 1 min. blitz player in the world! >> >> If anyone would like to see the games, i will be glad to post them here in pgn. >> >>Best regards, >>Terry > > >Just so you know, 1 min per game, same computer, no pondering, is _highly_ >unfavorable to null-move programs. Your computer is already very slow. And >the shallow search depths will be a real pain for programs using the null-move >for efficiency... Hiarcs7.32 is probably a null-move program. It was proved here that hiarcs could not find a good move from a game probably because of this reason(after doing the good move Hiarcs understood that it was a good move). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.