Author: blass uri
Date: 23:51:04 08/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 1999 at 00:51:03, Terry Ripple wrote: >On August 27, 1999 at 23:10:54, blass uri wrote: > >>On August 27, 1999 at 22:59:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 27, 1999 at 17:49:40, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>Blitz:1'/Game 1999 >>>> >>>> 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 >>>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 11110111½½111111½1111111111111½11111111111111111111111½1111½ >>>>2 Comet B04 00001000½½000000½0000000000000½00000000000000000000000½0000½ >>>> >>>>I'am using a AMD K6-2/266 and set 1.024Mb HT. (Played on a single PC) Now i - >>>>know why they say Hiarcs is the best 1 min. blitz player in the world! >>>> >>>> If anyone would like to see the games, i will be glad to post them here in pgn. >>>> >>>>Best regards, >>>>Terry >>> >>> >>>Just so you know, 1 min per game, same computer, no pondering, is _highly_ >>>unfavorable to null-move programs. Your computer is already very slow. And >>>the shallow search depths will be a real pain for programs using the null-move >>>for efficiency... >> >> >>Hiarcs7.32 is probably a null-move program. >>It was proved here that hiarcs could not find a good move from a game probably >>because of this reason(after doing the good move Hiarcs understood that it was a >>good move). >> >>Uri > >Hi bob and Uri, > I don't understand because you say Hiarcs is a null-move program and this is >bad for it, but why did it do so well in all these 1 min. matches? Please help >me to understand, thankyou! > >Regards,Terry I did not say that null move is bad for 1 minute games. Bob said it and he meant that Comet is a null move program so I replied that I know that Hiarcs is probably a null move program so it cannot be the reason for the good results of Hiarcs in 1 minutes games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.