Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs 7.32 vs Nimzo '99a (Bullet ??) on auto 232

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 05:42:23 08/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On August 28, 1999 at 08:26:12, James T. Walker wrote:

>Overnight I played 174 games with time control of game in 1 minute.  These were
>auto 232 games with Hiarcs on a PII-333 and Nimzo '99a on a K6-3-450.  The score
>according to the crosstable was 87.5-86.5 in favor of Hiarcs 7.32.  After
>checking the games for time control violations I find the score is 149-25 in
>favor of Hiarcs 7.32.  The problem is Nimzo seems to be programed to play only
>about 50 moves/minute.  So most all games over 60 moves were actually won by
>hiarcs on time.  In one game of 184 moves Nimzo had used 4:04 and Hiarcs had
>actually used 1:01.  This is the only game of more than 2000 in which Hiarcs has
>overstepped the stated time control.  Conclusion: If you give a program all the
>time it wants to play the game and ignore the time controls, it may do pretty
>good!

I might be a little ignorant concerning the meaning of bullet games. Please
explain why bullet games are interesting. They have no chess value whatsoever in
my opinion. Enlighten me :o).

Best wishes...
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.