Author: brain
Date: 22:39:53 08/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
So Bob, Voyager and Bionic are crafties. Can I know what else for my record? Thanks. On August 28, 1999 at 16:08:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 28, 1999 at 11:21:22, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>the result from the WT-5 tournament from Kai Skibbe, Christian Koch and me ! >> >>40 moves in 40 minutes, >>AMD K6-2 333 MHz, Pentium III 504 MHz and AMD K6-3 450 MHz, >>~ 32 MB for Hash-Tables, >>Ponder = Off >> >>Crafty, Voyager, Comet, Patzer, Bringer using 4-pieces Nalimov Table-Base >>Gromit and AnMon using 4-pieces Edwards Table-Bases ! > >You do know that 'voyager' is a dead copy of crafty, right? With just the >key character constants converted to German. This was revealed several months >ago and there was _zero_ doubt as I went thru the executable carefully and >posted a lot of what I found, just to make it clear... > > > > > >> >>IMPORTANT NOTE >>Zarkov, Nimzo, Voyager, LGoliath, Patzer, Francesca und LambChop >>are versions of programs in development and have been offered by >>authors to Kai, Chritian and Frank only for the explicit purpose >>of organizing this tournament. THEY ARE NOT PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ! >> >>01. Nimzo 2000a 102,0/144 70,83% 2572 ELO >>02. Zarkov 4.5h 95,5/144 66,32% 2538 ELO >>03. Crafty 16.11-16.15 92,0/144 63,89% 2521 ELO >>04. Voyager 5.08-6.01 89,5/144 62,15% 2510 ELO >>05. LGoliath 2000 75,5/144 52,43% 2445 ELO >>06. Comet B.04-B.05 75,0/144 52,08% 2444 ELO >>07. AnMon 4.26-4.27 70,0/144 48,61% 2421 ELO >>08. Patzer 3.0 64,0/144 44,44% 2394 ELO >>09. Phalanx 21 60,0/144 41,67% 2375 ELO >>10. Francesca 0.68d-0.70 58,5/144 40,63% 2369 ELO >>11. Gromit 2.20 58,0/144 40,28% 2367 ELO >>12. LambChop 8.2 51,0/144 35,42% 2333 ELO >>13. Bringer 1.4-1.5 45,0/144 31,25% 2303 ELO >> >>You can download the 936 games under ... >>http://members.xoom.com/VolkerPi/ >> >>Nimzo 2000a play very strong and this version is more than 100 ELO better than >>Nimzo 2000 ! Voyager win the matches against Nimzo 2000a, Zarkov 4.5h and Crafty >>16.15 with 6,5 : 5,5 lose against Gromit with 5,0 : 7,0 ! >> >>LambChop 8.2 play more than 100 ELO better than LambChop 7.1, this is very >>great, LambChop play an interesting chess, I like this program (and AnMon :-) >>and the others) >> >>For the new chess program Bringer ist this result sensational ! LGoliath 2000 >>play ca. 75-100 ELO better than LGoliath Gold 2.05 ! >> >>From Francesca we become in the last round an update. This new Francesca version >>play stronger. OK, when we play the next tournament, but not in the next 3-4 >>months I think ! >> >>The Crafty versions play an fantastic chess and I can not understand that Dr. >>Robert Hyatt say that the time managment from Crafty is bad when Crafty play on >>one machine. I can not see that. Crafty play under Winboard (without ponder) >>matches with a good time control and blitz not the last moves before the time >>control ending !!! >> >>In 620 games with Crafty (see the ELO-Ranglist from Kai Skibbe, Christian Koch >>and me under ... http://members.xoom.com/VolkerPi/ I see (when i looked the >>games, not all games) not problems with the time-managmant from Crafty on one >>PC. >> >>In 4550 games under Winboard we have 30 games with time problems, but the most >>of this 30 games are problems from the engines, not problems with time controls. >> >>We have all log files from Crafty (WT-5) and I looked this and see not problems >>with the time control, sorry Bob (great results from Crafty) ! >> >>OK, thanks for the programmer which give your programs for this tournament and >>sorry for my bad english. >> >>Kind regards >>Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.