Author: James Robertson
Date: 23:40:20 08/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 1999 at 00:00:02, odell hall wrote: >On August 28, 1999 at 16:23:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 28, 1999 at 08:03:19, odell hall wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>> This game was played at Santa Domingo last year, Time control was 40/2. >>>At move 36. Rebel played Bxe4? Accordinging to all my programs this move should >>>lose. Not being real great at endgames I cannot be so sure. Maybe someone with >>>the crafty endgame tablebases can say for sure. Did the fide Master go astray or >>>did Rebel simply produce an endgame brilliancy? Here is the epd for the Crucial >>>position, as well as the complete game.` >>> >>>8/K5pp/8/2pk4/4p3/2P4n/PPB2P2/8 w - - id REBEL 10 400MHZ 128 - NM JUAN ML. >>>JAQUEZ; bm c2e4; >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> >>>[Event "4ta. COPA SAMANEL"] >>>[Site "?"] >>>[Date "1998.12.20"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "REBEL 10 400MHZ 128"] >>>[Black "NM JUAN ML. JAQUEZ"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[WhiteElo "2555"] >>>[BlackElo "2205"] >>>[ECO "B01"] >>> >>>1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 c6 5. Bc4 Bf5 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. O-O >>>e6 8. Bf4 Nbd7 9. Qe2 Bg4 10. h3 Bxf3 11. Qxf3 Rd8 12. Rad1 Bb4 13. Ne4 >>>Nxe4 14. Qxe4 O-O 15. Bb3 Nf6 16. Qe2 Bd6 17. Bxd6 Rxd6 18. c3 Rfd8 19. >>>Rfe1 b6 20. Qe5 c5 21. dxc5 Qxc5 22. Qxc5 bxc5 23. Rxd6 Rxd6 24. Rd1 Rxd1+ >>>25. Bxd1 Kf8 26. Kf1 Ke7 27. Ke2 e5 28. Kd3 Nd5 29. g3 f5 30. Kc4 Kd6 31. >>>Kb5 e4 32. Ka6 f4 33. gxf4 Nxf4 34. Bc2 Kd5 35. Kxa7 Nxh3 36. Bxe4+ Kxe4 >>>37. b4 cxb4 38. cxb4 Nxf2 39. b5 Kd5 40. b6 Nd3 41. b7 Ne5 42. Kb6 Nd7+ >>>43. Kc7 Nc5 44. b8=N h5 45. Nc6 h4 46. Ne7+ Ke4 47. Kc6 Nd3 1-0 >> >> >>Looks very dangerous for white, to me. Black's king is centralized, black's >>knight will get over to the queenside, and I don't see how two passed pawns are >>going to get past the knight and king. And then white has the minor problem of >>not being able to stop black's h pawn... >> >>I let crafty run thru depth 18 here, and it thinks black is winning easily and >>would play Kxe4 without thinking, eval after 18 plies +5.6 >> >>Are you sure that isn't a typo? Although it might just be desparation as white >>is losing anyway... > > >Yes, Howard has demonstrated that the Pgn file was faulty, and apparantly it was >correctly shortly after the event, Rebel was actually black, Bxe4? was obviously >a desparation attempt by a human in time pressure. Did the result get messed up too, or did Rebel lose? James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.