Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 22:19:02 08/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 1999 at 13:12:10, Will Singleton wrote: > >In the following position, it appears Amateur makes the right move (Qc5) without >fully understanding the consequences. Is it really the best move, and will your >program play it? > >30... Qc5 >2r3k1/1p2qpp1/1R2b2p/4N3/8/4P3/p3NPPP/Q4K2 b - - > >=================================================== > >Earlier, Amateur sacs the bishop for a supposed attack. Too aggressive? >11... Bxa3 >r1b2rk1/pp3ppp/2n1pn2/q1b5/2B2B2/P1N1PN2/1PQ2PPP/2KR3R b - - > >=================================================== (snip) A very pretty game, my congratulations. 1) 11 ...Bxa3: I made some analyses and it is difficult to know if the sacrifice is technically correct. I liked this type of move. 2) 30 ...Rc2 is a very strong move and wins with easiness, for this reason it's difficult to know which the best move. 3) PII-300, HT=64, Fritz5.32 Move Depth Time(sec) Evaluation Qc5 9 6 +0.19 Qc5 13 144 -0.81 Fritz5.32 keep up Qc5 on depths 10, 11 and 12. Depth 13 ends with Qc5, time=430sec. Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.