Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 22:21:12 08/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 1999 at 23:08:33, Mark Young wrote:
>[Event "?"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "????.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Kasparov"]
>[Black "World"]
>[Result "*"]
>[ECO "B52"]
>[PlyCount "132"]
>
>{W=11.5 ply, B=11.5ply} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bxd7+ Qxd7 5. c4 Nc6
>6. Nc3 Nf6 7. O-O g6 8. d4 cxd4 9. Nxd4 Bg7 10. Nde2 Qe6 11. Nd5 Qxe4 12. Nc7+
>Kd7 13. Nxa8 Qxc4 14. Nb6+ axb6 15. Nc3 Ra8 16. a4 Ne4 17. Nxe4 Qxe4 18. Qb3 f5
>19. Bg5 Qb4 20. Qf7 Be5 21. h3 Rxa4 22. Rxa4 Qxa4 23. Qxh7 Bxb2 24. Qxg6 Qe4
>25. Qf7 Bd4 26. Qb3 f4 27. Qf7 Be5 28. h4 b5 29. h5 Qc4 30. Qf5+ Qe6 31. Qxe6+
>Kxe6 32. g3 fxg3 33. fxg3 b4 34. Bf4 Bd4+ 35. Kh1 b3 {Both last book move} 36.
>g4 {0.08/13 4050} 36... Kd5 {0.21/13 5887} 37. g5 {0.30/13 4113} 37... e5 {
>0.30/14 3683} 38. Bd2 {0.15/14 6298} 38... e4 {0.00/14 3759} 39. Bf4 {
>(Rb1) -0.02/13 5353} 39... e3 {0.20/13 6203} 40. g6 {0.15/12 727} 40... e2 {
>0.00/13 969} 41. Rb1 {-0.55/13 1821} 41... Ne7 {-0.55/14 608} 42. Kg2 {
>-1.10/14 1849} 42... Ke4 {-1.10/13 592} 43. Bxd6 {-1.20/12 403} 43... Nf5 {
>-1.20/13 576} 44. Ba3 {-1.58/12 1287} 44... Kd3 {-1.68/12 561} 45. Bb4 {
>-2.73/13 2896} 45... b2 {-2.73/13 545} 46. Kf3 {-2.83/13 386} 46... Ng7 {
>-2.83/13 531} 47. h6 {-2.83/13 387} 47... Nf5 {-2.83/13 532} 48. Be1 {
>(h7) -4.28/13 2565} 48... Nxh6 {-4.62/14 533} 49. Bf2 {-5.13/14 823} 49... Bxf2
>{-5.38/14 534} 50. Kxf2 {-8.44/14 2264} 50... Kc2 {-8.44/15 535} 51. Rh1 {
>(Re1) -8.29/13 250} 51... b1=Q {-8.29/14 536} 52. Rxb1 {-8.29/14 250} 52...
>Kxb1 {-8.47/17 537} 53. Kxe2 {-8.47/18 250} 53... Kc2 {(b5) -25.59/18 538} 54.
>Ke3 {-25.59/18 251} 54... b5 {-25.59/17 540} 55. Kf4 {-25.84/17 425} 55... Kd3
>{-25.84/17 541} 56. Kg5 {-26.12/15 85} 56... Ng8 {-26.12/4 0} 57. Kf4 {
>(Kg4) -#36/14 21} 57... b4 {-#26/14 102} 58. Kg5 {(g7) -#27/12 11} 58... b3 {
>-#24/12 23} 59. g7 {(Kh4) -#18/11 5} 59... b2 {-#15/10 4} 60. Kg6 {
>(Kf4) -#14/9 1} 60... b1=Q {-#10/8 0} 61. Kf7 {(Kh7) -#13/7 0} 61... Qa2+ {
>(Qb7+) -#6/7 1} 62. Ke8 {-26.18/5 0} 62... Qe6+ {(Kd4) -#5/4 0} 63. Kd8 {
>-#4/4 0} 63... Nf6 {-#4/2 0} 64. Kc7 {-#3/2 0} 64... Nd5+ {-#3/1 0} 65. Kd8 {
>(Kb7) -#2/1 0} 65... Qe7+ {-#2/1 0} 66. Kc8 {-#1/1 0} 66... Qc7# {-#1/1 0} *
What time control did you use? It's end is strange. The mate-distance varies
from 36, 26, 27, 24, 18, 15, etc? Can you try to improce your lines. According
to your scores, 41 Rb1 is a weak move and 40 g6 is a weak move. I think if you
calculate them on 15 and 16 respectevly you should be able to find better moves.
It can also be that your evaluation fluctuates a lot due to asymetric evaluation
function.
Thanks for you post! Very interesting.
Kind regards,
Michel Langeveld
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.