Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 02:25:57 09/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 1999 at 04:44:38, Harald Faber wrote: >On August 31, 1999 at 19:09:50, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hello Robert, >> >>Result: >>~~~~~~~ >> >>Time from Zarkov (WinBoard debug file) >> >>The game Zarkov - Crafty >>See post from yesterday, PGN and log file from Crafty ! >> >>AMD K6-3 450 MHz, WinBoard 4.0.3, Ponder = OFF, >>Crafty 24/8 MB Hash, Zarkov 8 MB Hash >>40 moves in 40 minutes ! >>Game from WT-5 tournament ! >> >>I replay the game (Crafty with ponder = on) >>40 moves in 40 minutes ! >> >>Result: >> >>2 other moves ! > > >*1* single different move can change the whole game and result! > > >>Of course not enough analyses, but I make >>this analyses with many programs and I can >>not see that ponder is 50-100 ELO ! >> >>Not more than 20-40 ELO (ponder = off) and >>10 ELO for an other time manangment ! >> >>Kind regards >>Frank > >Really hard to say. >1 different move cannot change a win into a double win. :-) >It even can change it to a draw or loss like it can change a draw to loss or win >or a loss into a draw or a win. >Very time extensive to find that out. >And the negative effect (played move X without ponder which is much better than >move Y with ponder) is certainly not because of ponder but because of search >depth+eval or didn't get Crafty to ply+n with ponder? > >BTW your English is really....improvable. ;-) I think, an good message in an bad english is better than an bad message in an good english ! I can make the experiment with games from the WinBoard tournament and I found not an other result ! Kind Regards Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.