Author: Shep
Date: 08:19:32 09/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 1999 at 09:18:49, Harald Faber wrote: >On September 01, 1999 at 03:05:49, Shep wrote: > >>On August 31, 1999 at 03:44:03, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On August 31, 1999 at 03:33:55, Shep wrote: >>> >>>>Hi all, >>>> >>>>just check out 17...Rxf3! from game #1 and 22. f4!! from #2. >>>>At least the latter should be very hard to find for any other program. >>>> >>>>Hiarcs didn't get 22. f4 in 1 minute (CM played this move in under 20 seconds, >>>>found it under 10 sec.). >>>>CM chose 17...Rxf3 instantly. >>> >>>Anyone comparing or checking what CM6000/sel.10 and CM6555 would play or where >>>they differ? >> >>CM 6000 SS10 would play 22.f4 only within the first 10 seconds and then opt for >>another move. It also plays 17...Rxf3 almost instantly. >> >>--- >>Shep > >I checked this too, there are several moves unique by CM6666. If 22.f4 is realy >so strong and leads to a clearly better position isn't obvious for me. For me neither, but 6666's findings are way over my head anyway. :-) If I find the time, I will play from the position after 22.f4 with 6666 against other top programs to see if they can draw or win it. It may be a while until I get to it, but it's on my list. --- Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.