Author: blass uri
Date: 03:48:46 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 04:41:28, Steve Schooler wrote: >The Chessbase support notes indicate that the Fritz 5.32 engine is 10 >times faster than the HiArcs 7.32 engine, because of HiArcs extensive >"positional library". Based on recent postings, HiArcs 7.32 seems >(generally) more powerful, despite it's "slowness". I believe further >progress may be made by "merging" the two engines (algorithms). It is not truth that Fritz is 10 times faster than Hiarcs You can be sure that if you give Hiarcs 10 minutes per position and you give Fritz 1 minute per position than hiarcs will be clearly better in tactics(I am not talking about positional understanding). Fritz is calculating more nodes per second but it is irrelevant because the question is the time you need to see tactics and not the number of nodes per seconds I suggest you to ignore chessbase notes because they are misleading Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.