Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:05:26 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 1999 at 23:40:33, Dave Gomboc wrote: >Time management has become relatively important. I'm not sure how much penalty >there is to using a naive time management implementation than a sophisticated >one. It would be interesting to hear the opinion of commercial developers on >this. My guess would be 20+ elo. It has been suggested that much work has gone >into CSTal's time management code, so I sympathize with Thorsten's point of view >here. > >I think it's best to test with a time control of n moves in x minutes, on two >machines, with pondering on, where n should be significantly more than 1. :-) the main problem is that he uses a version that is broken. a beta version only designed to show multi-engine user-interface working ! he is not allowed to download it. he did. he is not licensed to post results. he has done. and - he is not using normal tournament time controls and no ponder. brilliant ! :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.