Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:17:00 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 04:28:18, Harald Faber wrote: >I am curious how you argue for these games. :-) you will see... >>>>Let me guess: 2.50 is BUGGY and you have a better style for 2.02/2.03 (like you >>>>always have/had) which would play better... :-) >> >> >>first: 2.5 IS buggy. >Ah! I knew it! :-) >CSTal versions were ALWAYS buggy, especially when someone presents CSTal-losses. >:-) as is said: 1.you were not allowed to download it. 2.you were not licensed to post results. 3.the user-interface works. it shows multi-engine and also styling-feature in. but the styling feature in this beta-version is not fixed. the style-sliders completely kill the evaluation function because the internal and the external style data is corrupted. but we never gave this version free for testing purposes. this version was build to show user-interface. you are unable to read , are you ? you download stuff, you do stuff, without ever thinking. like a zombie downloading files, never reading nor thinking. why don't you throw both pc's into water and wait what happens. maybe hiarcs wins this too ? maybe cstal cannot swim ? >AFAIK YOU wrote it has the 2.02 or 2.03 implemented. the new styling feature is broken. this styling feature was NOT in 2.03. it was new in 2.50. but did not work. since i know this (because i have found out by playing games and saw that these rubbish games can only come from a broken version) i have changed back to 2.03. you played also games. but because you fullfilled you prejudice, you did not come to any realistic conclusion. instead you presented your images from your mind. thank you. >OK, then I'll play the 2.03 again. Do you recommend to use YOUR settings or the >original ones just to make clear I use the BEST settings recommended by YOU. default style. we have no new program version, since 2.50 is broken. also 2.5 was never presented for testers. it was for programmers. >No need to argue Thorsten, I also KNEW BEFORE that you will find at least 5 >moves you can't reproduce. You ALWAYS did. No matter which version one took. look- i am interested in facts. you seem to be interested in word games. play yours. >Of course not. It was MY PERSONAL impression based on the games I have seen. I >stated it very clear. based on games produced by a broken version, without time management, without pondering.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.