Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:30:23 09/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 14:31:26, James T. Walker wrote: >>>game/60', 2 * Cyrix/IBM 6x86MX PR-300 >>> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13.0/17 >>>2 CSTal II ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0/17 and nobody of you is irritated by these results. you really believe cstal would be that much weaker than the last 10 games SHOW? what you see is how the ssdf-guys have been betrayed over the last 1 year by a company i don't want to name here. i still stand to my word. they have cheated and they continue their job. and you will get these kind of faked data. IF you allow them to play games with you this way.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.