Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:25:20 09/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 1999 at 18:01:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 02, 1999 at 04:20:38, Harald Faber wrote: > >>BOTH had an AMD-K6-200. So if you say a) drives a Trabbi then b) drives a Trabbi >>too what again gives EQUAL CONDITIONS!!!! >>Is this so difficult to understand??? > >a porsche is not that good in driving backwards, a trabbi is. >so BOTH drive backwards, but the better car loses the test, because >porsches are not constructed to drive backwards. >you don't get it, he ? I hope you see how stupid this comparison is. BOTH PROGRAMS PLAYED THE SAME MACHINE, so there is NO TRABBI-vs-PORSCHE BUT TRABBI-vs-TRABBI. GOT IT NOW??!!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.