Author: blass uri
Date: 07:49:20 09/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 1999 at 09:22:47, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 02, 1999 at 19:32:41, KarinsDad wrote: >>2) This is only a theory. In fact, the exact opposite has been postulated on >>several occasions and there are quite a few test results that may indicate that >>we are finally at an NPS where the slow searchers do better at blitz that the >>fast searchers. > >nonsense. in theory and in real. WE are FINALLY at an NPS. >Who is we ? >what is the sense of finally. there is never a FINALLY. maybe for you. >not for me. Hiarcs is not worse than Fritz or nimzo at blitz so your theory that testing a fast searcher against a slow searcher giving both 3 minutes blitz (e.g.) advantages the fast searcher is wrong. It is possible that your theory is right for tal but you cannot generalize about fast vs slow searchers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.