Author: brain
Date: 20:19:07 09/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
True also. In that case, perhaps the same opening book for all the programs. On September 03, 1999 at 21:08:31, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 03, 1999 at 21:03:13, liam hearns wrote: > >>pete,why not switch off the book on all to see which has a better consept of the >>overall game. >Actually, that will produce the opposite result. Having a good opening book >will make chess programs have a much better concept of the overall game. The >initial opening is a closed formation. Chess programs should have a "book" for >every commonly encountered closed formation. > >Why should a million hours of scrutiny by human experts and machine analysis be >thrown out in order to induce a few silly mistakes?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.