Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What about the result of game Rebel-Hoffman? (NT)

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 04:53:57 09/05/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 1999 at 07:33:40, Andrew Dados wrote:

>On September 05, 1999 at 03:53:35, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On September 05, 1999 at 02:54:08, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On September 05, 1999 at 00:11:40, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 04, 1999 at 23:25:27, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 04, 1999 at 22:17:37, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On September 04, 1999 at 18:35:32, James T. Walker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I feel bad for Ed and the Rebel team.  It appears that ED had a corrupted
>>>>>>>version of Rebel loaded and it crashed 10 times during the match.  It was still
>>>>>>>a good game in which the GM IMHO played very good.(As GM's are prone to do).  I
>>>>>>>think his opening selection was perfect for him.  He seemed to be in control
>>>>>>>most of the way after gambiting a pawn.
>>>>>>>Jim Walker
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No.. the problem was the overclocked AMD machine.  If you overclock, you ask
>>>>>>for trouble.  And in general, if you ask often enough, you receive what you
>>>>>>ask for...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm not counting this game in the "Is the computer a GM?" rating calculation,
>>>>>>as obviously Rebel was broken by the hardware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For the record, overclocking AMD is _bad_.  I have had several horror stories
>>>>>>from Crafty users about this.  It seems that the AMD engineers know what their
>>>>>>chips can run at, and going beyond that gets you into deep water.  Intel seems
>>>>>>to be more conservative rating their chips...
>>>>>
>>>>>I heard that Ed said it was a bad version of Rebel that caused the
>>>>>problem....but I know your statement is true about AMD in general.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>All I can say is what Ed said to me during the game... he also reported that he
>>>>had bogus problems in Paderborn...  illegal moves in the PV, etc.  It is
>>>>definitely possible that the program was broken, however.  But I have seen log
>>>>files from crafty run on a misbehaving overclocked AMD, and they were pretty
>>>>amazing.  Bogus scores, bogus moves, all sorts of nonsense...
>>>>
>>>>One person only had the problem after several consecutive games, indicating some
>>>>sort of thermal problem.  Others just got bogus values, but things were fine
>>>>when the clock was set back to normal...
>>>
>>>He is what Ed posted on the Rebel Board.
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________________________
>>>Rebel lost. After 10 crashes the moves of the game are lost too. Rebel
>>>apparantly played with a wrong version. After 10 crashes I loaded the
>>>Sorin/Rohde version. No crashes since then but then it was already too late. I
>>>am sorry, it never happened in my whole life I played with a corrupted version.
>>>Expensive though! So most likely it was not the hardware. I have some homework
>>>to do!
>>>Ed
>>>____________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>Some quick online notes, I will report more precisely later.
>>
>>I take the above back, it was a premature conclusion. After some more
>>testing after the game the version that played Sorin/Rohde also crashed.
>>
>>In the game Rebel played 40.Rg4 showing a score +2.30, that is ridiculus
>>of course. I can not reproduce this with any Rebel version I have.
>>
>>In any case yesterdays game was meaningless for the statistics and the
>>discussion if micro's are at GM level on tournamemt time control. Of
>>course the result remains including the financial consequences.
>>
>>Ed
>
>
>  It is my understanding reading rules for GM Challenge that independent third
>party (Enrique Irazoqui) was supposed to verify Rebels moves during game. Why
>didn't he give you a clue that something is unreproductible/grossly wrong?
>(Meaning - obvious hardware failure while both program copies were identical).

This was done in game one against GM Rohde. But then from game-2 and on I
switched to the special KryoTech machine. Enrique now checks the game
afterwards because the KryoTech machine runs twice as fast as a PII-450.

Ed Schoder


>-Regards-
> Andrew



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.