Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 13:31:56 09/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 1999 at 09:51:52, Pall Sigurdsson wrote: >On September 05, 1999 at 08:52:54, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>The game must count. Whether it was the hardware or the software it must count >>towards the total result against the GM's >> >>In my opinion this is the same as a GM who loses and says that he had an itchy >>bum all thought that game that made him play poorly. >> >>Whether the program or hardware, you offered the challenge and if something went >>wrong that is because of some error on your part in programming, research or >>preperation. >> >>Programs play poorly in some cases and sometimes plays strange moves. The >>software and hardware are all part of the package. Just like a GM. >> >>If an GM is sick and loses he cannot forget the loss, it counts. You hardware or >>software was sick. So the result must count. >> >>I am sure some will disagree, but I think take the error or stuff up on the chin >>and continue stronger. > > >Remember the grandmaster who commented that he had never beaten a healthy >opponent! > >;-) > >Regards, >Pall Sigurdsson I am verry pesimistic aproge and here by acuse Gm Rhode Sorin and Hofman by only using comp comp games to beat Rebel and here by chalange them all There is simply now way a Gm exactly makes the same moves as a computer does for starters a gm never would allow to get this queen and knight in it's position. If they think it is funny to play like that they should play me actualy this has nothing to do with chess anymore only by walking databases.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.