Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:25:52 09/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 1999 at 03:14:58, blass uri wrote: >I think that the games were adjudicated too early > >Hiarcs evaluated the final position of the first game as +2.xx pawns advantage >and tal has to prove that it knows to win. You are maybe right with the first game. i can continue it later. i had no interest in continuing it, better start some more games. will do this later. >The second game is probably a draw but you should play some moves to see if the >sides want repetition again and again(a game is a draw only when there is a >third repetition). it was hiarcs asking for a draw after repetition. since cstal had draw evaluation and no main -line, operator accepted hiarcs draw-offer. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.