Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 02:36:46 09/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 1999 at 03:25:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 06, 1999 at 03:14:58, blass uri wrote: > >>I think that the games were adjudicated too early >> >>Hiarcs evaluated the final position of the first game as +2.xx pawns advantage >>and tal has to prove that it knows to win. > >You are maybe right with the first game. i can continue it later. >i had no interest in continuing it, better start some more games. >will do this later. > > >>The second game is probably a draw but you should play some moves to see if the >>sides want repetition again and again(a game is a draw only when there is a >>third repetition). > >it was hiarcs asking for a draw after repetition. since cstal had >draw evaluation and no main -line, operator accepted hiarcs draw-offer. > > >>Uri I gone over the first game move for move and on Move #17...axb4(-.20) my Hiarcs chooses for black on move #17...Ne7(-.42).Plus i agree that it was ended too early because there were rooks and minor pieces plus black pawns for some compensation for the piece. I feel it's a tough enough position to make a program prove itself! I played with Hiarcs on both sides and Hiarcs was able to win from the white side! All pawns are off the board except white's f-pawn that wins the game for white. The question is, can CSTal2.03 win in this position? Regards,Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.