Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About the REBEL-HOFFMAN game

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:59:59 09/06/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 06, 1999 at 08:57:19, Walter Koroljow wrote:

>
>A few comments:
>
>1) Thank you very much Ed for making our lives more interesting and exciting!
>
>2)  In all the posts so far I can only find mention of two Rebel moves that were
>not verified by Enrique Irazoqui. His post mentions only one such move, and that
>was  later in the game.  Does this mean that the game would have been identical
>with what happened up to move 40 or so if the hardware had worked correctly?
>
>3)  Does the game count?  Yes, if you are interested in evaluating
>(Rebel+Kryotech) against grandmasters.  No, if you are interested in evaluating
>Rebel, the software, against grandmasters.
>
>4)  Why would someone know better than AMD what speed their chip can run at?
>Because they had extensively tested it running cooled and AMD had not.


Right... Kryotech knows _exactly_ what they are doing.  :)  Ed didn't have a
hardware problem at all.

When you play on the leading edge, you often end up on the bleeding edge.  Ed
bled a lot this time.



>
>5)  Was Nietzche right when he said that adversity makes us stronger?  There is
>definite experimental evidence that it makes us (or at least laboratory test
>animals) weaker.  Read "The Stress of Life" by Hans Selye.  Animals were cooled,
>allowed to adapt to the cold, and then brought back to a normal environment.
>They were then found to be unable to withstand cold as well as animals that had
>not been cooled at all.
>
>Perhaps the AMD chip is weakened by repeated coolings....
>
>Cheers,
>
>Walter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.