Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 17:19:20 09/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
>>>>>>On September 05, 1999 at 12:49:02, Peter Hegger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On September 05, 1999 at 04:38:57, Paulo Soares wrote: >>>>>>> Snip >>> >>>I still think it was risky to gambit a pawn, especially when it gives white a >>>passer on the a-file. Against another human perhaps it would work, but against a >>>computer I think a QGD or Queens Indian type set-up might have been safer. >>>That's just my opinion though. >>>If you don't mind could you post the other programs evals on 16 Qc1, 17 Bh6 and >>>19 Ra2? I don't have any programs strong enough to do a trustworthy analysis. >>>I'm interested to know how the other programs would have fared out of the >>>opening. Thanks. >>>Peter >> >>Gambit Benko is an opening used in games among GMs, I think that a GM can also >>use it against a program. >>Want you analyzes of other program after white played 16.Qc1? >> >>Paulo > >Yes, Paulo if you have the analysis by Fritz and/or Hiarcs I'd be interested to >see >it. >Regards, >Peter Analyzes after 16.Qc1: PII-300, HT=64Mb Fritz5.32: Depth 12, time=675sec, evaluation=+0.91 16... Nc7 17. a4 Rba7 18. Qc2 Ra5 19. Rd2 Na6 20. Rdd1 Nb4 21. Qd2 Hiarcs7.32: Depth 10, time=1004sec, evaluation=+0.77 16... Qa6 17. e5 Rab8 18. Re1 Nxe5 19. Nxe5 dxe5 20. Bxe5 Bxe5 21. Rxe5 Nd6 22. Qh6 You can analyse the positions with the help of Crafty, that is a strong program, and you can download it from ftp://ftp.cis.uab.edu/pub/hyatt/ Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.