Author: blass uri
Date: 04:22:57 09/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 1999 at 05:21:36, Lin Harper wrote: > Two (or twenty thousand and two) heads are not better than > one, when it comes to playing chess. That's why chess professionals, > don't have problems when playing groups in consultation. Kasparov > would have known that the game would be either a draw or a win for > him. I disagree. 2 heads can be better than one if they know how to work together. Example: If one player is better in the opening and middlegame stage and the other one is better in the endgame then they can do better result then one of them if they give the first one to play the opening and the second to play the endgame. Another example parallel crafty is better than not parallel crafty exactly because of the fact that 4 heads are better than one when they know how to work together. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.