Author: blass uri
Date: 07:01:08 09/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 1999 at 09:20:05, blass uri wrote: >On September 06, 1999 at 17:52:31, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Here is game 7 as mentioned in the subject line. This is an interesting game >>because of the uneven material of Q vs RBN. Usually the 3 pieces win this type >>game. The 3 pieces in the hands of a computer become a multi-arm monster. >>Crafty now leads the match 5-2. >> >> >> >> >>[Event "40/2"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "1999.09.06"] >>[Round "7"] >>[White "Chess Tal II"] >>[Black "Crafty 16.15"] >>[Result "0-1"] >> >>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 exd4 8. >>Re1 d5 9. Nc3 dxc3 10. Bxd5 Bb7 11. Bg5 Be7 12. Rxe4 f6 13. Bxf6 gxf6 14. Ng5 >>fxg5 15. Qh5+ Kd7 16. Be6+ Kd6 17. Qh3 Nb4 18. Rd1+ Kc6 19. Rxd8 Raxd8 > >r2R3r/1bp1b2p/p1k1B3/1p4p1/1n2R3/2p4Q/PPP2PPP/6K1 b - - 0 1 > >I do not understand what is the reason that crafty did not play 19...Rhxd8 > >My crafty16.6 as an engine for Junior wants to play Rhxd8 and after Raxd8? Bd7+ >there is a significant drop in the evaluation. Tal also did a big mistake when it missed a draw in the game by 16.Qh3+ or 16.Qg4+ but it is not surprising because when I look at the games I see that the wrong knowledge of tal pushes it to play bad moves. I want to know what was tal's evaluation when it played 16.Be6+? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.