Author: vitor
Date: 13:14:50 09/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 1999 at 14:14:20, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Jouni, > >Hiarcs 7.32 on my 333mhz PII with 64MB ram said that the game was a draw over >ten moves ago. Of course, the world could make a stupid move. The really >stupid decision to let Kasparov have two outside connected passed pawns was >inexcusable. This game is starting to look like "professional" wrestling. > which move was the mistake that allowed kasparov the connected passers? please show us how the world could have avoided the connected passers. im sure after you look a little deeper into the game you'll have a whole new appreciation for pro-wrestling. >There is now a remote chance that with flawless king play Kasparov could win. you mean flawless Queen ending play since thats where the game is headed >The "world" will have to make another very minute blunder for this to occur. >Those without chess computers or are not masters would not notice it and claim >that Kasparov is brilliant. He is brilliant, but this has been a pretty equal >game. > allowing Kh1... minute blunder or kasparov is brilliant? or both? or is it just semantics? >It is an exciting game but the moves should have been every twelve hours and not >every 24 hours. > >Tim Frohlick i think organizers decided on 24 hours to account for the difference in time zones and give people around the world some time for analysis.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.