Author: James Robertson
Date: 13:19:18 09/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
I think it is important to see the arguments for both sides, which I don't think were presented. Obviously, the argument that the game should not count is that Rebel was not playing at its full strength, so we didn't get to see a healthy Rebel play. But, a GM that is sick and plays much worse than normally has to live with his results; he can't just say the game "doesn't count". If the GM's 'hardware' has a cold and isn't working right, it should be no different than if Rebel's hardware isn't working right. Anyway, those are the two arguments. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.