Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting mate test for hashing

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 11:38:42 09/10/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 10, 1999 at 14:27:05, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 10, 1999 at 13:49:50, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>><= Mate in N is simply not stored.     <- A nasty case.
>>>= -Mate in N is simply not stored.    <- Likewise.

>You used the term "a nasty case" on the last two.  Did you run into problems
>when you stored them?  Or just the overwrite issue?

I ran into problems when I screwed up and stored it wrong.  I can't remember
exactly what my bug was, but I probably messed up and converted it into a >=
mate in 500 lower bound, which is of course almost exactly wrong.  This can
happen if you just look at the score and convert it to a bound, for instance "if
(score >= mate_low) { score = mate_low; bound = lower; }"

It's just a case that has to be paid attention to and disposed of properly.

bruce




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.