Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting mate test for hashing

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 23:28:00 09/10/99

Go up one level in this thread


>There are only three choices here.
>
>(1) best <= alpha.  We don't know anything about any of the moves.  Yet I
>believe Ed (and I thought you as well) said that if you take this 'best'
>move and store it in the hash, it works well.  In my test, it didn't.
>
>(2) alpha < best < beta.  This is a move with an _exact_ score that is
>correct.  Also known as a PV-candidate move normally.
>
>(3) alpha < beta < best.  This is a fail high move.  It is better than the
>best that is allowable.  It is _not_ the best move at this level however,
>it is just good enough to produce a score >= beta and terminate the search early.
>This is the case that feeds (1) above at the previous ply.  If we try
>_another_move here we might get an even _bigger_ score here, and back up an even worse
>score to the previous ply.  But alpha/beta makes us stop _now_.

I like to try this. One question: what is "best"?

the score of the node?

the best score sofar on this ply?

Ed




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.