Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:27:43 09/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 1999 at 14:05:12, Leon Stancliff wrote: >Robert, > > > > I have been speculating for a long time on what would take place in a match >between the top ten computer programs running on easily available machines and >the top ten chess players in the USA. > > I have been playing my Hiarcs 7 program on a Macintosh G3 at 275 Mhz. It plays >almost even with both Data and Singacrafty on ICC. > > I have assembled the following list of computer programs from such sources as >the SSDF list and the Selective Search list. In your opinion, would Data, >Singacrafty or Crafty deserve a position in this list? > > > > Hiarcs 7.32 > > Fritz 5.32 > > Chessmaster 6000 > > Nimzo 99 > > Chess Tiger 11.8.2 > > Junior 5 > > Rebel 10 > > Shredder 3 > > Genius 5 > > MChess Pro 7 > > > > Let's assume that each is running at about 550 Mhz on a single CPU. > > > > MChess Pro 7 I wouldn't venture a guess. If you put crafty on a quad xeon 550, it can beat _any_ of those programs. On equal hardware I really don't know as I don't play on 'equal' hardware. :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.