Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 16:50:11 09/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 1999 at 16:07:47, odell hall wrote: >On September 11, 1999 at 15:27:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 11, 1999 at 14:05:12, Leon Stancliff wrote: >> >>>Robert, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have been speculating for a long time on what would take place in a match >>>between the top ten computer programs running on easily available machines and >>>the top ten chess players in the USA. >>> >>> I have been playing my Hiarcs 7 program on a Macintosh G3 at 275 Mhz. It plays >>>almost even with both Data and Singacrafty on ICC. >>> >>> I have assembled the following list of computer programs from such sources as >>>the SSDF list and the Selective Search list. In your opinion, would Data, >>>Singacrafty or Crafty deserve a position in this list? >>> >>> >>> >>> Hiarcs 7.32 >>> >>> Fritz 5.32 >>> >>> Chessmaster 6000 >>> >>> Nimzo 99 >>> >>> Chess Tiger 11.8.2 >>> >>> Junior 5 >>> >>> Rebel 10 >>> >>> Shredder 3 >>> >>> Genius 5 >>> >>> MChess Pro 7 >>> >>> >>> >>> Let's assume that each is running at about 550 Mhz on a single CPU. >>> >>> >>> >>> MChess Pro 7 >> >> >>I wouldn't venture a guess. If you put crafty on a quad xeon 550, it can beat >>_any_ of those programs. On equal hardware I really don't know as I don't play >>on 'equal' hardware. :) > > > Oh yes!, i would love to see the results of crafty verses the top programs on >equal hardware, It would be interesting to see how it would measure up. Ok, I think the right "equal hardware" should be 16-CPU Alpha 21264. Or (if it happenes that some programs will not run on Alpha), a 8-CPU Xeon. Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.