Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 17:05:14 09/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 1999 at 19:50:11, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On September 11, 1999 at 16:07:47, odell hall wrote: > >>On September 11, 1999 at 15:27:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 11, 1999 at 14:05:12, Leon Stancliff wrote: >>> >>>>Robert, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been speculating for a long time on what would take place in a match >>>>between the top ten computer programs running on easily available machines and >>>>the top ten chess players in the USA. >>>> >>>> I have been playing my Hiarcs 7 program on a Macintosh G3 at 275 Mhz. It plays >>>>almost even with both Data and Singacrafty on ICC. >>>> >>>> I have assembled the following list of computer programs from such sources as >>>>the SSDF list and the Selective Search list. In your opinion, would Data, >>>>Singacrafty or Crafty deserve a position in this list? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hiarcs 7.32 >>>> >>>> Fritz 5.32 >>>> >>>> Chessmaster 6000 >>>> >>>> Nimzo 99 >>>> >>>> Chess Tiger 11.8.2 >>>> >>>> Junior 5 >>>> >>>> Rebel 10 >>>> >>>> Shredder 3 >>>> >>>> Genius 5 >>>> >>>> MChess Pro 7 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Let's assume that each is running at about 550 Mhz on a single CPU. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> MChess Pro 7 >>> >>> >>>I wouldn't venture a guess. If you put crafty on a quad xeon 550, it can beat >>>_any_ of those programs. On equal hardware I really don't know as I don't play >>>on 'equal' hardware. :) >> >> >> Oh yes!, i would love to see the results of crafty verses the top programs on >>equal hardware, It would be interesting to see how it would measure up. > >Ok, I think the right "equal hardware" should be 16-CPU Alpha 21264. Or (if it >happenes that some programs will not run on Alpha), a 8-CPU Xeon. > >Eugene Sounds good to me! :-) Do Intel Paragons consist of x86 chips? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.